Includovate Research Ethics Application Form
To be completed by the applicant
This application form is to be used to seek approval from the Institutional Review Board for all research involving human participants. Includovate employees and researchers are to submit this form prior to commencement of research.Â
A completed version of this form should be emailed to the Institutional Review Board of Includovate via irb@includovate.com with the subject heading âApplication for Ethical Approvalâ. All applications must use this form; attachments will not be accepted other than those requested on this form. Annex 1 is compulsory.
Research must NOT begin until approval has been received in writing from the Institutional Review Board.
Applicant details
1.1 Applicant name: | Kristie Drucza |
1.2 Applicantâs position in Includovate: | CEO |
1.3 Contact email: | [email protected]Â |
1.4 Study name: | Enhancing WEE and tackling unpaid care (WEE-UC) |
1.5 Date of application: | |
1.6 Co-applicants:
Notes: List the names of all researchers involved in the study. Include their position held and their qualifications. If additional space is required please attach separate sheet |
Kristie Drucza – Team LeaderÂ
Alemi Desta – Researcher Hidaya Muhiden – Researcher |
1.7 Funding body:Â | IDRC |
1.8 Research start date:Â | March 2023 |
1.9 Research end date: | August 2024 |
- Research ethics and protecting participants
2.1 The Researcher(s) will: |
|
2.2 Participants have the right to:Â |
|
Please sign your name here if you have read and agree to abide by 2.1 and 2.2 | Name
Signature |
- Project details
3.1 Summary & Justification (Maximum of 500 words)Â
Provide a brief summary of the project in lay terminology. The project summary should include the following details:Â
|
The Project aims to capture evidence around womenâs economic empowerment (WEE) and unpaid care in Ethiopia in order to encourage policy actors to take practical actions. WEE enables women/girls (individually and as a group) to gain collective power, meaningful choices and control over their lives. The Ethiopian Government has taken firm steps towards the promotion and implementation of WEE and gender equality. However, the implementation of these commitments has been hindered by many factors leading to a mismatch between the policy discourse and the reality on the ground.
The first and immediate goal to be achieved through this project is tackling WEE and unpaid care burden through three work streams: Rapid technical assistance and expert analysis, capacity strengthening of key policy actors, and strengthening of in-country coalition of key WEE champions. The project will synthesise the fragmented evidence base on WEE and unpaid care and widely disseminate this to help advocate for changes. The project has three objectives:
|
3.2 Background literature review (Maximum of 500 words)
|
Ethiopia has adopted policy and institutional measures to promote gender equality, but still has a significant gender gap, ranking 74th out of 146 countries. The participation of women in the formal and informal labour market (74.2%) is lower compared to that of men (86.5%). Womenâs unpaid care has been addressed from several different angles in Ethiopia. In terms of policy, both Ethiopian Women Development and Change Packages (2006, 2017) focus on increasing technology in rural areas, such as access to electricity and potable water to reduce the time women spend fetching water. GoE has committed to carrying out a national time-use survey on unpaid care and domestic work (UCDW) that will be used to âinform the planning, budgeting and implementation of public services that can reduce and redistribute heavy and unequal UCDWâ. Ethiopia has implemented many policies, programmes, and laws that influence or contribute to womenâs economic empowerment and address gender inequalities. Yet, results for women have been slow to materialise. Labour force participation is higher among men, with 72% of women in the labour force compared to 85% of men. Firms with female majority ownership is around 17% while firms with female top managers is around 5%. Unpaid care work, which largely falls to women, is essential to the economy. Yet, it goes uncounted and unrecognised. The lack of access to child care remains a major constraint for women entering the workforce.
The GoE has expressed its commitment and support for WEE through the development of national policies, laws and frameworks that facilitate movement towards womenâs empowerment and gender equality. For example, a MoWYCA technical committee undertook a gender gap assessment as part of developing the National Action Plan for Gender Equality in 2006, but a full evaluation of the 1993 National Policy was not undertaken until 2020 as part of the Seizing the Moment project. A new national gender policy is being drafted, presenting an excellent opportunity to use evidence and capacity building to influence policy makers. Gender equality goals need to be revisited and strengthened via policy and programme implementation in the wake of COVID-19. With telecommunications reforms such as Safari.com entering the country, more people will be connected to the internet and able to work from home, and more businesses will emerge, leaving women further behind if WEE does not improve. As the country sets out to âbuild back betterâ post COVID and conflict, foreign direct investment will be a necessary part of this process. The success of the industrial park zone and evidence from past programmes implies the need for concerted attention to issues such as gender based violence, workplace harassment and discrimination, and intersectionality. There is a lot of appetite and opportunity to influence policies, but there is also a risk of policy incoherence without ongoing technical gender capacity to shape the policies. Moreover, the soaring inflation in the country hits women the most because they are already less paid and engaged mostly in the informal economy. They need more hours to work to cope up with this situation. This makes addressing WEE crucial at this point in time. |
3.3 Research design and methodologyÂ
|
Research Design
Regarding the research design of the study, four questions were asked to develop the approach that will be used throughout the project implementation which are described below:Â
Includovate will reinvigorate linkages and form new connections to address three work streams mentioned above and research objectives and will do the following:Â
The key policy partners are the ministries of Innovation and technology, Agriculture, Women and Social Affairs, Trade and Industry, Labor and Skills , Planning and Development , Finance and the Cabinet, also known as the Council of Ministers.Â
Policymakers are asking questions such as why men should do more unpaid care work, how to invest in maternity leave, what women want in terms of caring arrangements, and what policy changes would make a difference in addition to the topics in the National Action Plan for Gender Equality and rapid technical assistance can support the policy makers to find the answers to these questions and more through training, developing knowledge products, bringing interested stakeholders and the peer network together to brainstorm and to develop and test solutions.Â
The peer network will establish a shared purpose, identity, values, governance structure, communications system, knowledge management process, membership criteria, testing new business models, and identifying priority issues to integrate/develop WEE and care policies.Meanwhile, the helpdesk, workshops, and training with policymakers would help to identify key questions on WEE and care that policymakers are seeking answers for.
The short-term need for policymakers is to spark their interest in WEE and unpaid care, have the arguments and evidence they need to influence policy, reflect, learn and ask appropriate questions. The medium-term need is to work together across sectors to identify key entry points and overlapping issues, share knowledge and learning from each other, and motivate and support each other. The study Timeline:Â Location of the Study areas: Data Collection Methods:Â |
3.4 Sample size (Maximum 250 words)
Outline the intended sample size for the project and justify how this will meet the aims of the study. |
3.5 Research participants (Maximum 250 words)
Describe the characteristics of the participants that you intend to recruit in the study (e.g. inclusion/exclusion criteria, sex, age range of participants). |
The research participants for this study includes:Â |
3.6 Recruitment of participants (Maximum 250 words) |
3.7 Consent (Maximum 500 words)
Provide a detailed description of the consent process including:
Please attach a copy of the original consent form as evidence in Annex 3. **If you are seeking a waiver of consent, provide sound justification. |
|
xxx |
3.8 Reimbursement of expenses or incentives to participate (maximum 100 words)
Will participants be paid? If so, how much? |
There will not be any expenses or incentives to participate offered in the study. This will be explained to participants in advance and it is also part of the informed consent document that the participants need to sign. |
3.9 Risks to participants (maximum of 250 words)
Describe any discomfort or inconvenience to which participants may be subjected. Include information about:
|
3.10 Collection of data and privacy and confidentiality (maximum of 500 words)
How will the data will be collected, stored or disclosed:Â
|
Includovate takes safeguarding seriously. We pride ourselves on upholding the highest regard for ethics throughout our projects. Includovate has an agile, responsive and hands-on Safeguarding Committee that oversees Includovateâs efforts aimed at ensuring that those working for, or otherwise coming into contact with, the organisation are not harmed in any way. Regular check-ins by the team leader will be performed to ensure the team can raise any concerns. Includovate will not be biassed and have any reason for conflict of interests; respect participating communitiesâ culture, social norms, values and behaviour; maintain appropriate relationships with participants in this research and keep private information about beneficiaries, acquired during the research, strictly confidential. In the case of minors, the parent or caregiver/guardian would also give consent for a child to be interviewed or participate in the study. After the parent/caregiver has provided their consent, the child would be required to give their own verbal consent in the presence of a witness. The children will be assured that their consent is not compulsory, even if the parent has given permission for the child to be interviewed. All team members will undergo background checks before working on this project. Includovate has a Child and Youth Safeguarding Policy and it has previous experience working with children and knows how to include and engage them in data collection.
The participants will be asked to give consent for audio recording of the interviews. The recordings will be stored in a password-protected folder with limited access. All data will be anonymised. |
3.11 Publication and dissemination of results (maximum of 250 words)
|
Annex 1:Â Research Design or Matrix
Indicator/research questions | Data Source | Collection methods | Analysis procedure |
Annex 2: Observation ChecklistÂ
Country: Ethiopia | ||
Project Intervention Title: Enhancing WEE and tackling unpaid care (WEE-UC) | ||
Project Location: Ethiopia | ||
Object of Observation | What to Observe | Remark |
Annex 3: Key Informant Interview Guide
PART 1: Background Information | ||
No | Questions | Responses |
1.1 | Name of the respondent | |
1.2 | Name of the Organisation | |
1.3 | Name of the department | |
1.4 | Current role/job title of the respondents in the Organisation | |
1.5 | Number of years in the position/role above | |
1.6 | Age of the respondent | |
1.7 | Education of the respondent | |
1.8 | Gender of the respondent | |
1.9 | Nationality | |
1.10 | Do you identify as having a disability | 0=No 1=Yes |
Questions |
|
Annex 4: Focus Group Discussion (FGD) Guide
Background InformationÂ
S.No. | Name | Gender | Age | Religion | Occupation | Mother tongue | Place of residence | Marital status | Economic status | Level of education | Disability status |
1 | |||||||||||
2 | |||||||||||
3 | |||||||||||
4 | |||||||||||
5 | |||||||||||
6 | |||||||||||
7 | |||||||||||
8 | |||||||||||
9 | |||||||||||
10 |
Date _______________________________ Place ____________________________ FGD Group (Male/Female)_____________________
Name of facilitator: ________________________________________________________________________
FGD Questions
|
Annex 3: Consent forms
- Consent Form for Key Informant Interview
Title of the Project: Unpaid care and WEEÂ
Client: IDRC
Research firm: Includovate
Lead investigator: Dr. Kristie DruczaÂ
- Consent Form for Focus Group Discussion
Title of the Project: Unpaid care and WEE
Client: IDRC
Research firm: Includovate
Lead investigator: Dr. Kristie Drucza